skytopia.com

About Me

The highest place on the planet!

April 29th, 2003

Jumping ahead of myself

Posted by Twinbee at 04:29 PM on April 29, 2003.

I'm jumping ahead of myself, and trying to play the bass along with the treble in the 13th, 14th and 15th bars. It's slow. I also attempt the second page with the 'saddening' descending of notes (it's the part just before where the main tune repeats - I love it). Again, progress is slow...

3 comments

April 28th, 2003

Faster and faster...

Posted by Twinbee at 04:29 PM on April 28, 2003.

That 13th bar I can play better than ever now - something like 110bpm - even 115bpm. This isn't quite fast enough if I want to play for real (which needs to be around 130bpm I imagine?), but hopefully, that'll come with practise.
I'm beginning to surprise myself. Just occasionally, I can play the fifth bar at a great speed, and very accurately timed too. It's like - "Woah, was that me who just played that?". That's a good sign I think ;-)
On the downside, I'm still having massive trouble getting the 7th bar up to speed (the one with the rising treble line: A-1, C#-2, D#-2, F#-2, A#-2, C#-3, D#-3, B-3, A-3, G#-3, F#-3, E-3, D#-3 F#-3, C#-3 ...). Will I ever get it up to speed?

Add a Comment

April 24th, 2003

Arpegios and what not

Posted by Twinbee at 04:26 PM on April 24, 2003.

Progress seems to be slow but steady. At the moment, the second page is only a glimpse in my eye, and I still haven't reached anywhere near perfection on the first 10 bars. My timing is still iffy, and worse, a new nightmare has cropped up - the 13th bar. I struggle to play just the right hand up to speed, and fail miserbaly. If there was ever such a thing as a tongue twister in music, this would be it. I'll try to explain why:
A 'normal' arpegio would go something like: C, F, G, upper C. But the equivalent here would be C, upper C, F, G. I think it's because I'm so used to playing 'normal' arpegios, that the fingering is currently a bit difficult. Anyway, it's:
G-1, G-2, B#-1, C#-2,
F#-1, F#-2, B#-1, C#-2,
E#-1, E#-2, B#-1, C#-2,
F#-1, F#-2, B#-1, C#-2.
(that's for one bar's worth)

Now, that's easy to master if you're playing simple crotchets, but it's when you're pummeling allegro semiquavers - that things start to get difficult. Which by the way is an understatement.
Progress is super-slow here. I use the metronome and play the same 16 notes over and over and over again. First off, I use a slow enough timing, so I can manage the bar at a speed which doesn't get my fingers in a twist. Then I speed up the metronome fractionally. Then a little bit more... then a bit more... (80bpm, 85bpm, 90bpm, 95bpm, 100bpm).

Hey, I think it's working! 20 minutes later, I find that I can play the bar at a speed that I could have only dreamt of before! It's occasions like this when you just /know/ that you're getting better :-)

Add a Comment

April 22nd, 2003

Boring, but somehow fun...

Posted by Twinbee at 01:33 PM on April 22, 2003.

Just woke up - back to the grind stone for some practise. Actually, it's kinda boring /and/ fun at the same time, and from experience, I know it will become more and more fun the further I progress into the piece. Hmmm... :)
They say practise makes perfect. Is there a limit though? How hard can a piece get before it's out of reach? Not long ago, I created a classical/jazz style piece for the piano for a college project. It was meant to be playable, but since I create most of my music on computer, I love to add immense complexity, and stop at nothing to add tons of notes, chords, aswell as near impossible finger 'jumping' and arpegios. In fact, it probably was /impossible/ to play perfectly - even by the best pianist in the world.
Cue - my devious scheme to get my adept college music teachers to play the piece >;-)
I wonder what went through their mind after first glimpsing the tune. As expected, they did have problems, and trundled throuh the piece with all the grace of a certain computer operating system. One commented after that I should have made it playable for a human. What, and limit the music's potential? Oh well ;P

Anyway, I'm digressing. I'm getting quite good at a few bars now. In particular, the 5th, 6th and 7th bars. The timing is still iffy, but I'm speeding up, and unbelievably, my success ratio for hitting the right notes is actually starting to improve.
OK, the first real hint now; when playing both hands together, it's a good idea to play the bass-line as seperate chords.
For example, take the first set of 6 quavers in the 5th bar (the number after each note signifies the relative octave by the way):
C#.1 - G#.1 - C#.2 - E.2 - C#.2 - G#.1
.....would be played initially as a /single chord/. This will help to familiarise your fingers to the right notes without worrying about the timing. And then a little later, you can attempt to play it properly as a real arpegio. In other words, you are playing 2 single chords in the bass to every 16 notes in the treble. This is certainly easier than 12 notes in the bass to every 16 notes in the treble.
And it does seem to work. Certain bars I had big problems with (like the seventh bar) seem to benefit from this way of practising. After a little while, I find I can place my fingers on the correct notes, and can even get the nightmarish triplet style timing to a semi-reasonable level when playing for proper.

Add a Comment

April 21st, 2003

What I saw...

Posted by Twinbee at 01:31 PM on April 21, 2003.

22/4/2003
You may have guessed what I saw. Yes, it's the horrible way you have to play 8 notes in the treble to every 6 notes in the bass - causing timing problems for people like me. Apparently, not many people can get the timing /spot on/. I'll give it my best shot, but I'm already beginning to think that I'll never be able to get this quite right. But pessimism never got anyone anywhere :)

So, with a gusto, I attempt to play the fifth bar, but just the right hand melody line:
[rest], G#, A, G#, G, G#, C#, E, D#, C#, D#, C#, C, C#, E, upper G#
Perfect! Well, actually no; those notes above are correct, but it's far from what I /actually/ played. I get it sort of right after numerous attempts though, and then dare myself to play the bass along with it.
Bad idea.
Almost as expected, I failed miserably. Before, I can even attempt to play both together, I need to get both hands as fluent as possible. I've heard it is possible to practise both hands together, but for a piece of this complexity, I think hands seperately is best.
Hints and tips I picked up so far: Sometimes, the fingering in a piece can look seem stupid, but it's generally always there to help you out. Big help huh? Sorry, that's the best I can do for now ;)

Hmm... ignoring the timing of the piece, I'm also worried that I'll even be able to get the music up to speed. They're semi-quavers in the treble, and everything's at Allegro Agitato!! But then, that is why I chose this piece in the first place. I wanted to see if I could play one of the hardest and most daunting pieces of music I could find. Determination and enthusiasm, if nothing else could get me through this, and after /mucho/ practise, maybe I will. I actually like the piece too, but that's a secondary consideration ;)

Add a Comment

« | »